.png)
Fundraising is often treated as a test of momentum: build the deck, speak to investors and get the round closed as quickly as possible.
But raising capital is not simply about securing the highest valuation. The type of investment you accept, the rights you give away and the legal shape of the business at the point of investment can all affect what happens next from how decisions are made to how much founders receive on an eventual exit.
Good legal preparation should not slow a round down. Done properly, it makes the business easier to diligence, strengthens your negotiating position and gives investors fewer reasons to price in risk.
We've pulled together 12 things founders should think about before, during and after a raise.
Capital is a tool, not a form of validation. Before starting a round, be clear about what the money will enable you to do and whether external equity is the right way to fund it.
Equity is permanent. Debt is not, although it comes with repayment obligations and its own risks. Grants and other non-dilutive funding may allow you to grow while preserving more control.
Stress-test the decision before you proceed:
The legal question is not simply, “Can we raise?” It is: “What structural consequences will this capital introduce?”
Investors price risk, and legal risk is part of that equation.
For a pre-product company, clean intellectual property ownership may be existential. Once the business is generating revenue, investors are more likely to scrutinise customer contracts, data protection compliance and the terms on which the product is sold.
Ideally, the milestone funded by your round should do more than increase revenue or user numbers. It should also:
Your fundraising narrative and legal position should support one another. If your pitch says the business is ready to scale, its foundations need to tell the same story.
Different sources of capital create different control structures.
An angel syndicate can leave you with a fragmented cap table. An institutional VC may request a board seat, veto rights and more extensive reporting. A strategic investor can bring commercial value, but may also create exclusivity concerns or other commercial entanglements.
Model the governance position before agreeing the deal. If this investor leads the round, what might your board look like by Series A? Which decisions could require investor consent? What happens when another lead investor wants a seat at the table?
Governance tends to accumulate over successive rounds. Rights that appear manageable now may become restrictive later.
Investors are broadly evaluating three categories of risk:
A strong fundraising story should anticipate all three. That means being ready to explain any potential IP disputes, founder issues, unusual ownership arrangements or regulatory grey areas — not hoping they remain hidden until due diligence.
Weak legal hygiene can undermine an otherwise compelling market narrative. Resolve what you can and develop a clear, credible explanation for anything that cannot be fixed before the round.
Fundraising from desperation rarely produces the best outcome. Starting with sufficient runway gives you more control over the process and more time to prepare the business properly.
Use that time to address common due diligence issues, including:
Investors do not expect every early-stage business to be perfect. They do expect its founders to understand what is outstanding and to deal with avoidable problems. If due diligence uncovers a mess that could have been fixed in advance, your leverage on valuation and terms may suffer.
Almost every company raising investment has a pitch deck. Far fewer have a data room that is complete, clearly labelled and easy to navigate.
A well-organised data room does more than make due diligence faster. It signals that the company is competently run and that its management understands the business.
The exact contents will depend on the company and the round, but the core folders will usually include:
Clean structure signals competence. Disorder signals risk — and risk can affect the deal.
It is easy to focus on the headline valuation and dilution in the current round. The more useful exercise is to model what the cap table could look like after this round, the next one and an eventual exit.
Factor in:
Then simulate exits at different values — for example, 1x, 3x and 10x — and identify who actually gets paid in each scenario.
The results can materially change your negotiation priorities. A high headline valuation is less attractive if the underlying terms make the economic outcome worse.
Creating momentum by batching investor meetings and working to a clear timeline can help founders retain control of a raise. The legal process deserves the same discipline.
Agree your internal red lines before a term sheet arrives. These might cover:
If the founding team starts debating its priorities only after receiving an offer, the investor controls the clock and your leverage can quickly disappear.
Valuation attracts the headlines. The terms determine much of the economics.
Look carefully at provisions such as:
In some cases, accepting a valuation that is 10% lower in exchange for cleaner terms can leave founders in a better position. Compare the whole deal, not just the number at the top of the term sheet.
SAFEs, convertible loan notes and other convertible instruments can appear quick and frictionless. They still need careful management.
Check for:
Used without a clear view of how they interact, convertibles can produce unexpected dilution and distort the cap table when the next priced round takes place.
Due diligence should not be one-directional. An investor may remain involved in your business for many years, so take the time to understand how they operate when circumstances become difficult as well as when everything is going well.
Speak to founders they have previously backed and ask:
Capital from a difficult investor can create a structural risk of its own.
The legal work does not end when the money lands.
After closing the round:
The standard at which you operate between rounds shapes the next due diligence exercise. Good discipline makes the next raise easier. Poor discipline simply postpones the clean-up — usually until the moment you have the least time and leverage to deal with it.
A successful fundraise is not just one that closes. It should give the company the capital it needs without creating unnecessary constraints, unexpected dilution or problems for the next stage of growth.
The best time to address those issues is before investors begin asking questions. Get the company structure, ownership, governance and data room in order early, decide what really matters to you in the deal and negotiate with the long-term outcome in mind.
If you are preparing to raise, reviewing a term sheet or getting your company ready for investor due diligence, our Corporate and Fundraising team can help you understand the risks, strengthen your position and keep the process moving. Get in touch today.